Published Social post

NaoX Protocol (@NaoXprotocol): The recent @AnthropicAI news is huge for NaoX. Here's why ๐Ÿ‘‡

Estimated coin impact

Scores are not price-change percentages. High impact means a score of +70 or more, or -70 or less.

Impact unavailable

The recent @AnthropicAI news is huge for NaoX. Here's why ๐Ÿ‘‡ Claude Mythos, Anthropic's model, just broke HAWK, a NIST post-quantum signature candidate, in 60 hours. Two years of human review missed the flaw. Days later, HAWK's authors withdrew it. The signature it could not touch? ML-DSA-87. The signature our quantum-resistant Layer 1 is built around. What it is: The Module-Lattice Digital Signature Algorithm, NIST's FIPS 204, standardized after a six-year, 82-candidate competition. NaoX runs the strongest parameter set: security Level 5, the highest NIST defines. How it works: ECDSA rests on elliptic curves, which Shor's algorithm breaks on a large quantum computer. ML-DSA rests on lattice problems: mathematics with no known quantum shortcut after decades of attack. How NaoX runs it: โ†’ Verified natively by the L1 itself: ~38.5 microseconds per signature, ~26,000 per second per core, every node computing the same answer โ†’ Implemented through liboqs, the audited open-source library the industry trusts. The standard, not a homebrew variant โ†’ 4,627 bytes vs ECDSA's 64. The graphic shows the full field. Those bytes are the security margin, and the chain was engineered to carry them HAWK fell in sixty hours. ML-DSA-87 came through untouched, with Anthropic's confirmation that the finalized standards stand. That's the signature NaoX transactions can be signed with, at the strongest level NIST defines.

Back to news archive