Naoris Protocol (@NaorisProtocol): Migration π building post-quantum from the start:
Estimated coin impact
Scores are not price-change percentages. High impact means a score of +70 or more, or -70 or less.
Migration π building post-quantum from the start: @ethereum is one of the most sophisticated engineering projects in the world. And it is facing a hard problem. Ethereum's push toward post-quantum cryptography is a serious, well-resourced effort. But upgrading a live global system that processes millions of transactions a day means doing several things at the same time: - Coordinating change across wallets, validators, exchanges and users who did not all sign up for a migration. - Modifying both the execution layer (where transactions run) and the consensus layer (how validators agree) without breaking compatibility. - Preserving the ability for existing applications to keep working while the underlying cryptography changes. None of those problems are impossible. But they take years. And during those years, the chain continues operating on cryptographic assumptions it is actively trying to replace. Every block that gets added during the migration window is a block signed under assumptions that will need to be superseded. That is not a criticism of Ethereum. It is the structural reality of upgrading any live system at this scale. Naoris approaches this from a different angle entirely. Because Naoris was built with post-quantum cryptography from genesis, there is no migration to coordinate. The algorithms used from the first block are the algorithms designed for the post-quantum world. There is no transition window, no phased retrofit, no period of operating under assumptions the chain is trying to leave behind. This is not a comment on whether Ethereum's approach is right or wrong. It is a comment on timing. The difference is time. And in this context, time is the variable that directly increases risk.