Da Hongfei (@dahongfei): The community supports constructive action, not necessarily any single individual. Yet, you persist in inflaming the community with conspiracy theorie…
Estimated coin impact
Scores are not price-change percentages. High impact means a score of +70 or more, or -70 or less.
Impact unavailable
The community supports constructive action, not necessarily any single individual. Yet, you persist in inflaming the community with conspiracy theories, falsely implying that I stole from Neo’s funds. The reality is simple. Neo’s capital sources are distinct: (1) The ICOs: Two separate raises conducted in 2015 and 2016. (2) NGC Fund 1: Capital returned in 2022, comprising a mix of BTC, ETH, stablecoins, and minor tokens. (3) Strategic Swap: A bulk NEO-to-ETH swap executed with a crypto fund several years ago. (All ETH position was fully liquidated between 2024 and Dec 2025 at an average price of ~$2,8xx). (4) The NF Treasury: The largest component which you explicitly controlled for over a decade. Identify the funding sources you claim I am hiding or stole from. NF and NGD ceased publishing financial reports in 2020 to minimize regulatory risk following the crypto crackdown in China. You were fully aware of this strategy and raised no objections for six years until late 2025. Now, you attempt to hijack Neo by setting an impossible standard - demanding that "every transaction over the last six (or eleven) years be traceable and verifiable" - and framing any gap as theft. I may have made strategic, management, or investment errors in the past, but I have never stolen from Neo. While I strive to rectify the situation, you continue to sabotage the process by hurling one empty accusation after another. Your actions reflect your real motivation.