Published Social post

Creator.Bid 🕵️🗝️ (@CreatorBid): Decaying Exit Tax (DET) Analysis

Estimated coin impact

Scores are not price-change percentages. High impact means a score of +70 or more, or -70 or less.

Decaying Exit Tax (DET) Analysis We have now had two launches using DET: @Hermes_Agent and @yapeclub. Here is what the data shows: Hermes - Total vested = 6,447,771 $HERMES - Total claimed: 1,952,368 (~30% of total vested) - Total burned: 1,173,861 (~60% of total claimed) - Total participants: 697 - Users who claimed: 152 - Users who did not claim: 545 Yape Club - Total vested: 5,103,349 $YAPE - Total claimed: 251,822 (~5% of total vested) - Total burned: 224,392 (~89% of total claimed) - Total participants: 309 - Users who claimed: 12 - Users who did not claim: 297 Main Takeaways 1. DET has already burned 5.6% of the total $HERMES supply. 2. Even with 30% of $HERMES already claimed, the chart is holding very well, proving the strength of the mechanism. 3. Only 12 users claimed $YAPE early, paying nearly 90% tax and burn. 4. Most users wait to claim later to avoid the early high tax (evident by the small number of users who claimed $YAPE). This shows the system effectively neutralizes post-TGE dumping, exactly as intended. 5. As the exit tax decays, more users will gradually claim. This ensures a steady burn of supply, prevents large dumps, and gives projects space to build utilities that incentivize staking, holding, and usage before the tax hits 0%. Gud tek. gBID

Back to news archive